| Notices |
Read the forum rules before posting! We know it's tempting to register and post a link to your cruddy SC2 site (or spam site), but please don't. You will be banned.
PLEASE search the forum for a topic related to your own BEFORE posting your own thread!
Have a question about how to play Terran? Read A Terran's Guide to the Universe!
Please note that we have a subforum SPECIFICALLY for spoilers Here. Any spoilers posted outside this subforum will result in a BAN. So please keep any sensitive story information to this subforum.
|
| General StarCraft 2 Discussion Talk about anything related to Starcraft 2 that doesn't fit into the other categories here. Please check that your topic doesn't belong in one of the other boards first. Beta Forum |
|
|

Cannon Fodder
Reputation: 0
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1
|
|

12-23-2008, 06:59 PM
|
 : 536
|
|
|
|
Starcraft 2 looks like Warcraft III to me. I wish so much that it looked more like Starcraft. The tilted camera angle bugs the hell out of me. And the way the camera sometimes seems to come extremely close to the ground when scrolling across terrain irks me as well. I'm such a huge Starcraft fan, I've played it since it came out, literally. I got it days after its release. but I played it the first time on its release date in '98.
It saddens me so deeply; it's like seeing Warcraft IV hit the shelf rather than Starcraft II. But I guess that's what it is. Does this affect anyone the way it does me?
|
|
|

Admiral
Reputation: 4
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,051
|
|

12-23-2008, 07:56 PM
|
 : 2,057
|
|
|
|
Nope.
The camera angle is I'd say the same for Starcraft 1 and Warcraft 3, because it's not level on the ground, or right above them. It's in between.
__________________
|
|
|

Immortal
Reputation: 3
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,162
|
|

12-23-2008, 08:19 PM
|
 : 37,107
|
|
|
|
Its an angle that makes it more realistic and less obvious its a 2D game (in starcraft1), thats the same angle in starcraft2 it appears.
Depending on the amount of camera movement you may be able to change it to how you want anyway, pick the exact angle and zoom if its like warcraft3.
__________________
"TERRIBLE, TERRIBLE DAMAGE!!" ~Dustin Browder
|
|
|

Cannon Fodder
Reputation: 0
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2
|
|

12-23-2008, 08:27 PM
|
 : 538
|
|
|
|
what r u talking about? StarCraft 2 looks Fuking Osum!!!
the reason Warcraft 3 rly rly RLY wasn't my type of game was... adunno actualy, always when i played with friends in multiplayer it always ended in the same scenario, everyone ran out of gold and had a ton of defence towers left over, so draw. A rly confusing game i'd say. The scenarios were fun though.
I do find it weird how the zergling now looks exactly liek a hellhound, but besides that i think it all looks great. Can't w8 for the release.
|
|
|

Corporal
Reputation: 0
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 195
|
|

12-24-2008, 12:43 AM
|
 : 2,787
|
|
|
|
I agree with overmind
I think you can change the angles to suit your style..
|
|
|

Super Moderator
Reputation: 6
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,718
|
|

12-24-2008, 02:02 AM
|
 : 19,632
|
|
|
|
It seems brighter and friendlier, not so dark and blocky like the old SC. I'll miss the look of the game but because I hadn't played it a lot, I won't be reminiscing too much about it. People will grow accustomed to it, jsut like people who played diablo were put off by d2's looks.
I've never played WC though, only seen it. It does look a tad like it, but since Blizzard is the one making all these games, it only seems right to think there will be similarities in appearance between them.
__________________

|
|
|

Immortal
Reputation: 3
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,162
|
|

12-24-2008, 02:13 AM
|
 : 37,107
|
|
|
Starcraft 2 is fortunately looking darker in the newer screenshots 
__________________
"TERRIBLE, TERRIBLE DAMAGE!!" ~Dustin Browder
|
|
|

Immortal
Reputation: 5
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,221
|
|

12-24-2008, 04:01 AM
|
 : 18,034
|
|
|
|
the only "brighter" look of sc2 is most probably the jungle tilesets and some of the really outstanding colour like pink and light green.
But i still rkn the game looks orsm.
__________________

|
|
|

Lord of Spam
Reputation: 5
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,159
|
|

12-24-2008, 05:50 AM
|
 : 2,427
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Broockle
what r u talking about? StarCraft 2 looks Fuking Osum!!!
the reason Warcraft 3 rly rly RLY wasn't my type of game was... adunno actualy, always when i played with friends in multiplayer it always ended in the same scenario, everyone ran out of gold and had a ton of defence towers left over, so draw. A rly confusing game i'd say. The scenarios were fun though.
I do find it weird how the zergling now looks exactly liek a hellhound, but besides that i think it all looks great. Can't w8 for the release.
|
wow, that must be the noobiest linguistics i have ever seen
anyways, i, for one, am glad that blizzard decide to go with a camera system that already proved its worth, instead of experimenting with a new system
|
|
|

Recruit
Reputation: 0
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 72
|
|

12-24-2008, 06:05 PM
|
 : 489
|
|
|
|
why would you rate a game on how it looks? diablo 3 went far enough with fanboys crying for darker scenario, but starcraft 2 looks so polished and awesome that complaining about the camera angle is like crying about getting a black ferrari for christmas when you wanted a red one. its nostalgic and stupid, so just shut up and be happy that blizzard has made such a masterpiece, besides its disappointing "camera-angle".
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Login Panel
Latest Threads
|